According to the latest population estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau, California’s total population declined by more than 500,000 between April 2020 and July 2022.
Put another way, 1 out of 100 people living in California at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic had, two years later, left the state — either by U-Haul or by hearse.
Where’d they all go?
- Some died, though there were far more births;
- Some left the country, though on net, more immigrants arrived;
- The major driving factor: Californians departing for other states.
Just counting out-of-staters coming in and Californians leaving, the state’s population saw a 871,127 net decline. If you’re wonderingwhy the state lost a congressional seat at the beginning of this decade, this is why.
This isn’t a national problem. It’s a California, New York, Illinois and Louisiana problem. California is one of only 18 states that saw its numbers decline and had the fourth biggest drop as a share of its population.
Topping the list of rapid growers are other Western states that aren’t on the pricey coast: Idaho, Montana and Utah.
That may be why Utah Gov. Spencer Cox recently pleaded with Californians to stay put rather than come as “refugees to Utah.”
- UCLA economist Paul Ong: “While salaries in other regions and states are lower, the cost of housing is even lower.”
But not all of California is shrinking at the same rate. And no surprise, housing seems to be the key explanation why. ASan Francisco Chronicle analysis of local population changes between 2010 and 2020 found that the fastest growing city in California was the East Bay bedroom community of Dublin, which permitted four-times as many new housing units per person as nearby San Francisco.
But as California lawmakers grapple with the housing and homelessness crisis, a familiar clash is emerging between state and local lawmakers:
- Despite a no-nonsense warning from Attorney General Rob Bonta, elected officials in Huntington Beach are vowing to fight state mandates to permitmore than 13,000 new units over the next decade. They also pledged to push forward a local ordinance toexempt the city from the “builder’s remedy” — an untested state law that punishes cities that haven’t met their state housing goals by allowing developers to build as many units as they like, so long as at least 20% are set aside for low-income residents.
- In the well-to-do ’burbs of Silicon Valley,builder’s remedy applications are beginning to pour in. But some cities are refusing applications outright, while others are charging five-figure processing fees.
- A nonprofit financed by the California Association of Realtors has been on a state-spanning lawsuit spree, asking courts to invalidate multiple cities’ housing plans, paving the way for builder’s remedy applications.
- With hundreds of cities still deemed “out of compliance” with state housing requirements, the Department of Housing and Community Development set up a new web portal inviting Californians to “report potential violations of state housing law.”
More housing conflict: Remember when San Francisco Sen. Scott Wienerintroduced a bill earlier this week that would require any developer who wants to make use of a particular housing law to pay their workers union-level wages — but stopped short of forcing developers to hire union members?
In anideological divide between the state building trades union and the carpenters, that put Wiener squarely with the carpenters.
On Thursday, the trades responded. They aren’t impressed.
- Trades President Andrew Meredith, in a statement: “Proponents’ attempts to paint this as an affordable housing play are disingenuous. This is clearly all about putting more money in developer pockets.”
Housing and inequality: And in many places in California, high housing costs are a driver of the gap between rich and poor.
Though the tech industry has laid offnearly 95,000 workers since the beginning of the year, Silicon Valley still represents one of the country’s highest pinnacles of wealth. Households across the region hold an estimated total of $1.1 trillion in cash and other “investable” assets. But some households have far more than others.
A new report shows the vast disparity in Silicon Valley: The top 1% hold a third of those assets, which don’t include homes, whereas the bottom half own a mere 1%, writes CalMatters California Divide reporter Alejandro Lazo. Just eight ultra-rich households held more cash wealth than the bottom 50% (nearly 500,000 households) in Santa Clara and San Mateo counties.
CalMatters is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media venture explaining California policies and politics.
